Fear will strengthen America
We generally perceive fear as a negative emotion, which often provokes hostility, selfishness and hatred, the sociologist points out. He adds that fear can also be a creative force – for example, because we are afraid of accidents, we drive very cautiously, save ourselves from being afraid of bad future times, and protect our children because we are afraid that something will happen to them.
Doin appeals that the response to China’s fears should not be a sudden suspension of cooperation with Beijing in areas such as a call for war or climate change that requires partnership. On the other hand, he believes that the threat posed by China could fundamentally change Americans’ attitudes towards government role in economic development and R&D, and as a result strengthen the United States.
If US President Joe Biden’s agenda is based on the slogan “Make it better again,” the word “better”, according to the professor, will include steps to protect US technological advantage and reduce US dependence on China in particular. Areas.
Politician Jennifer Harris and foreign policy adviser Jake Sullivan published an article in Foreign Policy magazine last February, pointing out that if Washington had more faith in private R&D, US companies would lag behind Chinese rivals, focusing on long-term, profitable applications. Findings, recalled the author of the comment. He also cites Harris and Sullivan’s view that without an industrial base to produce military crisis products, US security would be reduced to everything from military equipment to vaccines.
“We have reached the point where foreign policy is domestic policy and domestic policy is foreign policy.“Doin quotes Sullivan’s December words, which may be called Sullivan’s law,” said Democrat Senator Charles Schumer, a political scientist.
Cold War metaphors are instructive
Schumer is said to have told the editor that he began to face the Chinese challenge in 2003 after visiting the crusades in New York, when its owners told him they could not compete with Chinese currency handling. Schumacher’s concerns have grown into a monetary problem, including intellectual property theft and a practice commonly described by senators as Mercantilism, Doine said.
The Democrats hope that if the American industry performs well, the Chinese government will not allow it in its market, want to adapt its technologies and then compete with the United States through them, the professor explains. He added that Shumera was particularly concerned about the potential for China to overtake the United States in areas that could affect the economy and security, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning capabilities and quantum computers.
- You can read the comment in the original version Here.
In 2020, the senator introduced a bill allocating $ 100 billion to the U.S. National Science Foundation for research and development over a five-year period, and the company named its National Science and Technology Foundation, a political scientist. He notes that the law sets aside $ 10 billion to build regional technology centers and fund research and university scholarships.
According to the commentator, this issue supports the fact that it has the potential to gain the support of the entire US political spectrum, with Republican Todd Young co-sponsoring the bill and supporting it in the lower house by diverse politicians such as Progressive. Democrat Roh Khan and Republican Hawk Mike Gallagher.
Schumacher and his allies are trying to bring in a new version of the law that will increase funding for semiconductor production in the United States and expand domestic supply chains, the political scientist warns. As president of the majority party’s club, Schumer chooses which laws to discuss, which guarantees that legislators will truly see the future of American technology policy.
Although support for these ideas transcends ideological lines, this does not mean that there is no opposition to them, Doin says. He notes that right-wing Republicans are skeptical of any smell of industrial policy, that the resurgence of economic nationalism is seen as a threat by analysts from various camps to global development, and that part of the left-wing fears will begin to recall the US military industry. Cold War era.
“But Cold War metaphors suggest something different“The professor goes on to say that after the launch of the Soviet Union’s first satellite, Sputnik, there was a general panic in the United States, which, according to historian H.W. Brands, created almost every” educational liberal. ” The U.S. space program was also searched.
Doin says the fear of falling behind the opponent has long been a strong impetus to rebuild the country. According to him, this may also be true in contemporary America, which is politically polarized.
