Interior Minister Weser sees “historic momentum” for EU refugee policy. The Traffic Light Coalition has approved the asylum procedure application at the external borders. The target deadline is ambitious.
A few days before the summit meeting on German refugee policy on May 10, Federal Interior Minister Nancy Wesser (SPD) sees a “historic momentum” at the European level. It confirmed that it had been working for a long time to ensure that distribution within Europe needed to be improved Report from Berlin.
The Traffic Light Coalition now agrees that they want to promote a common asylum system. This also includes the asylum procedure at the external borders of the European Union, where migrants are registered, registered and identified. “I think it is very important to register and identify as soon as possible so that we can continue to open our borders in Europe,” Weser said. According to the Federal Minister of the Interior, the procedures should not last more than twelve weeks.
Working group with the countries of the European Union
This new approach also includes the fact that after these procedures there are member states in the countries of arrival that show solidarity and then receive these people. She’s been negotiating this for months.
Faeser reported in ARD broadcast by a working group in which Italy and Spain were represented as the first host country and potential host countries such as Germany, France and more recently Belgium and Sweden. It did not say anything about whether Eastern European countries such as Poland or Hungary were also involved in the operation.
indicated fibres Report from Berlin Again, many people from Syria and Afghanistan are coming to Europe. The protection rate for these people is very high, so there is little rejection.
The Common European Asylum System sets out how asylum seekers are treated in the European Union. According to the Dublin Regulation, a refugee must apply for asylum when they first enter the European Union. Indeed, many Mediterranean countries no longer register all migrants who then move on to other countries.
safer countries of origin?
There is always a dispute between the parties represented in the Bundestag over the origin of immigrants. Ahead of meeting with the federal government on May 10, some prime ministers are pushing for an expansion of the original safe countries list. According to Hamburg’s first mayor Peter Schentscher (SPD), this would speed up the asylum procedure in the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees and the administrative courts and ease the burden on the states and municipalities, a Senate spokesman told Welt.
He mentioned Georgia, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and India as country examples. People from these countries may submit a large number of asylum applications, but the protection rate will be very low. According to Tschentscher, the individual right to individual case assessment in the asylum procedure would remain unaffected by this.
Kretschmer demands pressure from Berlin
Saxon Prime Minister Michael Kretschmer believes that Georgia, Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia should be classified as safe countries of origin as “urgently necessary”. In these four countries, there is only a “minimum recognition quota”.
“The task of the Greens, the SPD and the liberals at the federal level is to ensure that outdated positions that are not up to date are discussed again,” said Prime Minister of Hesse Boris Rein (CDU). In Welt am Sonntag, Rein also called for at least doubling federal aid to states and municipalities, which currently stands at €2.75 billion.
Frei requires more money and more controls
Thorsten Frei, parliamentary director of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group, also called for better financial support for municipalities. He said in Al-Watan newspaper that the promised €2.75 billion was “clearly not enough”. report from Berlin, “Because the challenges relate to integration as a whole, day care centers, schools, housing and much more.”
Few decisions in February
At a meeting in February, the federal and state governments agreed to better cooperation and more transparency. The issue of finances was held up at the time – perhaps also because the federal government did not pay any money to the municipalities due to the lack of a legal framework.
